Distinctions between Incremental Innovation vs. Disruptive Innovation
Distinctions between Incremental
Innovation vs. Disruptive Innovation
This blog delineates the distinctions
between incremental innovation and destructive innovation: what exactly are
these types of innovation and how the lack of innovation can hurt an employee
in a large company. We will explore how
company culture, competitors, and strategic alliances can play a more direct
role in boosting or stagnating innovation and growth in a company that is entering
its maturity phase. Finally, this blog
will offer some tips on how best to utilize innovation, depending on the corporate
and social dynamics are present.
Innovation is vital to impact a company
to maximize itself throughout its growth phase in its product life cycle (PLC). Specifically, we will only be focused on the distinctions
between incremental innovation and disruptive innovation. These types of innovation is not necessarily
a dichotomy in which we are forced to cultivate bias on one type or
another. Ultimately, these types of
innovation overlap each other, but paradoxically there is room for distinction
in which when we choose one type, we must temporarily miss out on more creative opportunities
Businessdictionary.com defines incremental innovation as: A series of small improvements to
an existing product or product line that
usually helps maintain or improve its competitive position over time. Incremental innovation is regularly used within
the high technology business by companies that need to continue to improve their products to
include new features increasingly
desired by consumers. This type of innovation is extremely popular
and will continue to thrive throughout almost all types of industries since it
relates to the concept of constant improvement, from Edwards Deming.
Incremental Innovation
|
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Low risk
|
Low reward
|
Not the "creator of
conflict"
|
Misses out on growth
|
Company achieves goals
|
Missing paradigm shifts
|
Focused on constant improvement
paradigm
|
Carrying old methods
|
Disruptive innovation is defined on Wikipedia as: that helps create a new market and value network, and eventually
goes on to disrupt an existing market and value network (over a few years or
decades), displacing an earlier technology. This blog will focus more on how to cultivate
disruptive innovation and the costs of not
applying this in our professional lives.
Disruptive Innovation
|
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
High reward
|
High risk (subjective)
|
Take over an industry offensively
|
Unanswered questions
|
Directing competition and industry
dynamics
|
Reputation of lacking Visionary
Leadership
|
Opportunity to cultivate a blue
ocean strategy
|
Loss of opportunity to capture a
blue ocean strategy
|
There are
certainly some benefits with applying incremental innovation. For example, if we are positioned in a
company that favors “listening to your manager” and not “trying something new,”
then we are best left with the possibility of applying incremental innovation
at best. The possibility of conflict
making an appearance in your professional relationships between your boss and
co-workers is always a factor to take in.
Some employees dislike avoiding conflict at their workplace at almost
all costs, which can silently stagnate innovation.
For
example, let’s analyze a large company from culture that is focused on
incremental innovation, if any. The
company is extremely large and there is little room to get noticed from
management. The corporate culture is primarily
about following your goals that are established by your manager. Also, errors from the employee are noticed by
management and there is always high demand
to take an immediate position in the company.
Employees in this type are mostly risk-averse to innovation. If anything, they are more about just trying
to “do his job” and follow policies in the company….(I will complete this soon!)
Comments
Post a Comment